Usability Attributes for Mobile Applications: A Systematic Review

The usability of mobile applications (apps) is an emerging area of research because of the increasing use of mobile devices around the world. App development is challenging because each application has its own purpose, and each individual user has different needs and expectations from the apps. There are various apps available for each purpose, and the success of the application depends on its usefulness. This paper presents a systematic review of some of the most contemporary apps and highlights their usability attributes. It discusses usability models, frameworks and guidelines outlined in previous research for designing apps with enhanced usability characteristics. Based on this research, comprehensive guidelines for mobile apps’ usability can then be provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic €32.70 /Month

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

eBook EUR 96.29 Price includes VAT (France)

Hardcover Book EUR 121.31 Price includes VAT (France)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Similar content being viewed by others

A systematic literature review of mobile application usability: addressing the design perspective

Article 02 August 2022

Mobile Usability: Review, Classifications and Future Directions

Chapter © 2020

Design Techniques for Usability in m-Commerce Context: A Systematic Literature Review

Chapter © 2021

References

  1. Zhang, D., & Adipat, B. (2005). Challenges, methodologies, and issues in the usability testing of mobile applications. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction., 18(3), 293–308. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Gafni, R. (2009). Usability issues in mobile-wireless information systems. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 6, 755–769. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Harrison, R., Flood, D., & Duce, D. (2013). Usability of mobile applications: Literature review and rationale for a new usability model. Journal of Interaction Science, 1(1), 1–16. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Popa, M. (2010). Audit process during projects for development of new mobile it applications. Informatica Economica, 14(3), 34. Google Scholar
  5. Pocatilu, P., & Boja, C. (2009). Quality characteristics and metrics related to M-Learning process. Amfiteatru Economic, 11(26), 346–354. Google Scholar
  6. Fleming, I. (2016). An overview of the ISO 9126-1 software quality model definition, with an explanation of the major characteristics, from http://www.sqa.net/iso9126.html
  7. Rabi'u, S., Ayobami, A. S., & Hector, O. P. (2012). Usability characteristics of mobile applications. In Proceedings of international conference on behavioural & social science research (ICBSSR), Kampar, Malaysia. (Indexed by Thomson Reuters). Google Scholar
  8. Alturki, R. M., & Gay, V. (2016). A systematic review on what features should be supported by fitness apps and wearables to help users overcome obesity. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 5(9), 197–206. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Functionality of mobile apps in health interventions: A systematic review of the literature. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 3(1), e20. Google Scholar
  10. Kim, S., Lee, I., Lee, K., Jung, S., Park, J., Kim, Y. B., et al. (2010). Mobile web 2.0 with multi-display buttons. Communications of the ACM, 53(1), 136–141. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Gebauer, J., Shaw, M. J., & Gribbins, M. L. (2010). Task-technology fit for mobile information systems. Journal of Information Technology, 25(3), 259–272. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Sonderegger, A., & Sauer, J. (2010). The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: Effects on user performance and perceived usability. Applied Ergonomics, 41(3), 403–410. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Adipat, B., Zhang, D., & Zhou, L. (2011). The effects of tree-view based presentation adaptation on mobile web browsing. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 99–122. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Leung, R., McGrenere, J., & Graf, P. (2011). Age-related differences in the initial usability of mobile device icons. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(5), 629–642. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim, K., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2012). The relation between usability and product success in cell phones. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(10), 969–982. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Aryana, B., & Clemmensen, T. (2013). Mobile usability: Experiences from Iran and Turkey. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(4), 220–242. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Baharuddin, R., Singh, D., & Razali, R. (2013). Usability dimensions for mobile applications—A review. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 5, 2225–2231. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Boja, C., Doinea, M., & Pocatilu, P. (2013). Impact of the security requirements on mobile applications usability. Academy of Economic Studies. Economy Informatics, 13(1), 64. Google Scholar
  19. Hao, S., Li, D., Halfond, W. G., & Govindan, R. (2013). Estimating mobile application energy consumption using program analysis. In 2013 35th international conference on software engineering (ICSE) (pp. 92–101). IEEE. Google Scholar
  20. O’Malley, G., Dowdall, G., Burls, A., Perry, I. J., & Curran, N. (2014). Exploring the usability of a mobile app for adolescent obesity management. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2(2), e29. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Al-Wakeel, L., Al-Ghanim, A., Al-Zeer, S., & Al-Nafjan, K. (2015). A usability evaluation of arabic mobile applications designed for children with special needs—Autism. Lecture Notes on Software Engineering, 3(3), 203. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Zapata, B. C., Fernández-Alemán, J. L., Idri, A., & Toval, A. (2015). Empirical studies on usability of mhealth apps: A systematic literature review. Journal of Medical Systems, 39(2), 1–19. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Wei, Q., Chang, Z., & Cheng, Q. (2015). Usability study of the mobile library app: An example from Chongqing university. Library Hi Tech, 33(3), 340–355. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Chintapalli, V. V., Tao, W., Meng, Z., Zhang, K., Kong, J., & Ge, Y. (2016). A comparative study of spreadsheet applications on mobile devices. Mobile Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9816152ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Eraslan, E., İç, Y. T., & Yurdakul, M. (2016). A new usability evaluation approach for touch screen mobile devices. International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 10(2–4), 186–219. ArticleGoogle Scholar

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia Ryan Alturki & Valerie Gay
  1. Ryan Alturki